Mccartney Kessler vs Caty McNally Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Aug at 09:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kessler vs C. McNally

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kessler 1 - 0 McNally
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mccartney Kessler winning 2 and Caty McNally winning 0. The last match between Mccartney Kessler and Caty McNally was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 10-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mccartney Kessler getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kessler | 1 |
| McNally | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-10-25)
M. Kessler vs C. McNally H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $959,111 | Career Prize Money | $1,334,271 |
| 64.26% (169-94) | Career Total W/L | 60.24% (197-130) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 57.41% (31-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.62% (10-11) |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
M. Kessler vs C. McNally Match Preview:
- Kessler has a significant advantage in second serve performance, winning 41.72% of points, compared to Mc Nally's 34.44% over the past 6 months. How crucial is this? It could directly influence the match's outcome.
- For return games, both players are close, with Mc Nally winning 50.67% and Kessler marginally ahead at 50.78% for opponent's second serves. This similarity could lead to tie situations.
- Mc Nally is slightly more efficient in returning first serves, having a 35.24% success rate against Kessler's 32.68%. Will Mc Nally leverage this slight edge effectively?
- Kessler excels under pressure, saving 53.55% of breakpoints compared to Mc Nally's 39.2%, which might indicate Kessler's poise in crucial moments.
- Comparing recent performances, Kessler has won 62.5% of matches over the last year, whereas Mc Nally hasn't secured a win (0%). Does this dictate who has the upper hand?
- When facing stronger competition, Kessler has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.8, but details on Mc Nally's opponents are missing, potentially indicating lesser experience with high-ranked players.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Kessler shows strong resilience, having a 63% success rate, while Mc Nally has not won in similar situations over the past year.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Mc Nally seems slightly more successful, converting 43.06% of chances, compared to Kessler's 38.38%, which can be important for momentum shifts during the match.
Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing matchup of skill and current form between Mc Nally and Kessler.
While Mc Nally exhibits a robust ability to convert break points, their overall match-winning prospects appear limited by previous performance trends and second serve efficacy.
Kessler, boasting consistent match wins over the past year, shows superior prowess under pressure and a notable advantage in deciding sets, making them a formidable contender.
Based on these assessments, Kessler is the likely winner in this upcoming encounter, leveraging their superior recent form and capability to thrive in high-stakes scenarios.
Mccartney Kessler vs Caty McNally Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kessler vs C. McNally H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:31:19 | Average Match Time | 1:31:19 |
| 54% (33/61) | 1st Serve % | 65% (44/68) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (24/44) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 49% (33/68) | Return Points Win % | 39% (24/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Kessler Recent Matches Played
C. McNally Recent Matches Played

M. Kessler vs C. McNally Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.26% (169/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.24% (197/130) |
| 60.00% (366/244) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.40% (438/312) |
| 54.31% (3113/2619) | Games Win/Loss | 53.72% (3649/3143) |
| 66.48% (117/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.19% (85/69) |
| 50.00% (25/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.97% (46/32) |
| 77.27% (17/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.15% (37/15) |
| 66.67% (10/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 67.44% (29/14) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 377 | Aces Total | 601 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 788 | Total Double Faults | 1315 |
| 1:29:30 | Average Match Time | 1:32:18 |
| 325.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 332.65 |
| 62% (10100/16294) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13438/20584) |
| 62% (6262/10100) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8464/13438) |
| 45% (2799/6193) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3165/7146) |
| 49% (1029/2098) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1311/2624) |
| 47% (7532/16130) | Return Points Win % | 46% (9673/20831) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 44.00% (11/14) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (12/18) |
| 69.23% (36/16) | Main Tour W/L | 52.75% (48/43) |
| 65.97% (95/49) | Challenger W/L | 70.34% (102/43) |
| 76.92% (20/6) | Futures W/L | 69.57% (16/7) |
| 64% (167/259) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (194/322) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (33/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (28/57) |
| 66% (57/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (54/101) |
| 90% (142/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (202/171) |
| 10% (142/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (202/31) |
| 33% (121/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (125/25) |